« Not only was the Vytorin data a disaster, it turns out Schering-Plough couldn't count. | Main | Pathophilia »

February 10, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519bc269e200e5502b040a8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference One of the two Merck $650 million whistleblowers: "I'll probably buy some Merck stock, because I think it's a good company":

Comments

oakley sunglasses

"Some people think I'm a pathological serial qui tam relator," he said after settlements in his lawsuit and a separate case in which Merck is paying $399 million to other plaintiffs were announced Thursday." His part accounted for $250 million.

burberry uk

The second order, which the judge called an amended temporary restraining order, did not refer to the permanent injunction but may have been an effort to narrow it. The narrower order, forbidding the dissemination of the disputed documents, is a more classic prior restraint on publication.

burberry uk

The second order, which the judge called an amended temporary restraining order, did not refer to the permanent injunction but may have been an effort to narrow it. The narrower order, forbidding the dissemination of the disputed documents, is a more classic prior restraint on publication.

ray ban sunglasses

Judge White ordered the California web hosting company Dynadot to "immediately clear and remove" records from Wikileaks and "prevent the domain name from resolving to the wikileaks.org website or any other website or server other than a blank page," until the court can review the case further.

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
© 2010 Brandweek. All rights reserved. Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy Additional Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.