I know you read this board - you mentioned that in your visit in the Atrium recently.
You want to know why colleague engagement is low. Here's a start:
Why do I have to write in an anon board? TRUST ! If I contacted you via PFE email, the only thing that would happen is that I'd either get fired ASAP, or somehow be put on a perf plan and then fired. Shoot the messenger! (Yes Jeff, no one will tell you "you, the emperor, have no clothes on". Unfortunately, you and your direct reports DO NOT get the true information. I KNOW! I've heard colleagues at lunch say "I can't tell them (upper mngt touring the GTN site) the truth to their questions - my manager would fire me!!! I have to give the "party line -- all is wonderful".
PFE always said they only hire the best. Why are there the "bottom 10%" to be fired? And then another bottom 10% And so on. Do you think that atmosphere fosters ENGAGEMENT?
I'm worried about a management team that needs a survey to figure out whether or not colleagues are engaged.
Do you think an individual or a team ultimately gets the project over the goal line? Jeff- its a TEAM. BUT, the perfromance management system is aimed at the individual. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE? So you need teams to get the job done, but pick out INDIVIDUALS to reward. Backstabbing and posturing are rampant !
Efficiency??? Make scientists earning $100K+ figure out how to order stationary via Ariba rather than pay a stockroom clerk min wage to have a stationary stockroom???? Makes sense???????????????? Make scientists figure out how to reconcile hotel bills on the one or two annual trips? have to fill out an expense report for the monthly teleconf bill? have to do perf management 12 months of the year (goals, review of goals, harmonize goals, mid-year, year-end, IDP, review IDP,.......... WASTE OF TIME) SOPs GBPs ..... If PFE was a restaurant, it would take $1,000,000 AND TWO MONTHS TO COOK A HAMBURGER in PGRD!!!
Your managers (ADs, directors,...) are EXPERTS at scamming the system - their goals are designed to be able to be checked off to show a good years performance. Don't believe me! Look at Discovery - they rewarded CANs. Why were SO MANY people promoted for their CANs - and we still don't have new products on the market. They knew CANs = PERFORMANCE = PROMOTION. NOT, CANs = PRODUCTS = Performance !!!!!!
You want me to give 200% AND tell me I could be laid off in 2008, my pension plan is reduced, if I'm let go - no vacation pay,..... You don't see a problem
If Pfizer told its people "DO YOUR BEST - NO LAY-OFFS for 5 years - REASONABLE GPM - PERHAPS A FIXED % salary increase for all - rewarded risk taking - VALUED IT PEOPLE AS MUCH AS PFE WANTS US TO VALUE PFE, ....." maybe you would get your new products to market!
Bottom line - you have MANY high quality scientists that want to do a GREAT job - they are tired of the daily beatings, aggressive GPM, RIF, ATS, ATS2, transformation, .......
AND, the "big guys" get $100Ms packages for BAD PERFORMANCE. If I screw up, can I get a $5Mill package - PLEASE!!! Do you think reducing PFE diversity is good? sell fish food, sell consumer health, sell sell sell! NOW all of your eggs are in one basket! And it's a tough basket to fill - between FDA/MHRA, lawyers and insurance plans --- selling fishfood may be more profitable.
Jeff - somehow you have to figure out how to get the real information from the bottom of the pyramid. Otherwise, you will fail.
From,
"
The PFantom"