Q: How many countries in the world allow prescription drug commercials on television?
A: 2.
Q: Which ones?
A; The U.S. and New Zealand. Don't bitch, reference Forbes and CBC News.
And this is, of course, great for drug companies, advertising agencies and television networks in the U.S. The latter have come to depend more and more on the revenues of those ads.
According to the New England Journal of Medicine, direct-to-consumer advertising increased by 330 percent in the ten year period after 1996.
Now the FDA plans to study how 2,000 people react to television drug ads, to determine whether they have an overwhelmingly positive impression of products despite audio warnings about potential side effects.
Kind of interesting that it took the FDA ten years to make that decision. And that virtually none of the other industrialized countries have followed the U.S.
- Peter Rost, M.D. is a former VP of Pfizer and the author of Killer Drug and The Whistleblower.

Bullshit. I've seen drug commercials on TV in practically alle the countries I've visited: Norway, Spain, Germany, England, Japan, Hong Kong SAR and China to mention some.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 22, 2007 at 11:50 AM
maybe they meant "prescription drug" ads.
Posted by: muaddib420 | August 22, 2007 at 12:06 PM
Mario from Switzerland calling: Seen countless drug ads here on Swiss TV. What I haven't seen yet though are ads for prescribed drugs.
Posted by: Mario Aeby | August 22, 2007 at 12:09 PM
And guess how many countries really truly value and protect freedom of speech?
1.
Posted by: aggieben | August 22, 2007 at 12:12 PM
I'm Canadian and we also have drug ads.
What's your source for your "information"?
Posted by: Canuck | August 22, 2007 at 12:41 PM
Germany and Austria have drug ads too - Your article is INCORRECT
Posted by: skoops | August 22, 2007 at 01:06 PM
Mexico has prescription drug ads on TV
Posted by: rarrrrr | August 22, 2007 at 01:08 PM
aggieben: Yeah, like, in 1775 you ignorant prick.
Posted by: jdoe | August 22, 2007 at 01:37 PM
Actually, in Canada drug ads are allowed but "...they can advertise the name of a product or say what it treats. But they cannot do both at the same time."
So it's just more regulated...
http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/files/health/directads/
I'm sure it's similar to those other countries people have mentioned.
Posted by: amila | August 22, 2007 at 01:55 PM
New Zealand has a government-managed single buyer prescription drug program, from what I understand. In fact, it's even harder on drug companies than Australia is. What good would it do drug companies to advertise on TV in NZ?
Posted by: tikiloungelizard | August 22, 2007 at 02:11 PM
Yup, there are drug ads in Canada. And, as far as I've seen, all over the world.
Sure, we all dislike them, but spreading false information actually just makes things worse, and muddies what should be a clear issue.
Posted by: agitprop | August 22, 2007 at 02:21 PM
This is bullshit. Everywhere in Europe they're legal. But at least you got on reddit.
Posted by: Jonny | August 22, 2007 at 05:02 PM
Are there drug ads in Canada?
Posted by: schtum | August 22, 2007 at 05:03 PM
Aww, the quintuple post I was mocking disappeared.
Posted by: schtum | August 22, 2007 at 05:05 PM
The U.S. is one of two industrialized countries that permit TV drug ads - the other is New Zealand.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/21/ap4041735.html
Only the United States and New Zealand allow drug makers to advertise directly to consumers.
In Canada, pharmaceutical companies are permitted to either advertise the name of a drug, without making any claims about its use, or advertise a medical condition and remind readers, listeners or viewers that if they have this condition they can seek help from their doctors.
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2007/08/16/drug-advertising.html
Posted by: Peter Rost | August 22, 2007 at 05:08 PM
Add Denmark to the list of countries which show drug ads on tv.
Posted by: utro | August 22, 2007 at 05:53 PM
Utro, on TV stations sending from Denmark? No.
Posted by: Nom | August 22, 2007 at 07:01 PM
even though drug companies can advertise in new zealand, most dont , the ones i do recall stated "ask your doctor if ##### is right for you " no real disclaimers at the end of the add either
Posted by: tristanp | August 22, 2007 at 07:09 PM
America is the land of money. Everything is valid in the name of Gold! You want to destroy the planet? No problem, just show me the money. Money is the only thing that matters in America. The rest is crap.
Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2007 at 12:14 AM
In Australia they show them too. Not many but they are there. May be a similar system as the one in Canada described by jdoe. They can mention the name of the drug or the treatment it provides but not both.
Posted by: evilbob | August 23, 2007 at 02:11 AM
I can't recall seeing adverts on Austrlian tv for prescription drugs - only just panandol/nurofen/cough medicines/over the counter drugs - if proplems persist, please see your doctor.
Posted by: willlllly wonnnnnnnnnnnka | August 23, 2007 at 03:55 AM
I'm sorry, but this is exactly why you can't always believe what you read.
The article was written by a staff Associated Press writer. The statement is unattributed, it just hangs out there with no support and no context. So yes, it's an easy & fun statement to parrot and claim as true, but obviously the writer made a mistake.
So this blog entry's writer should correct his claim, since it's already been shown to be untrue by responders to this thread.
Posted by: Dan Smith | August 23, 2007 at 01:00 PM
So, out of all this, what we've discovered is that the original post was CORRECT. We also discovered that people are too stupid to understand the difference between advertising PRESCRIPTION DRUGS on television and advertising OVER THE COUNTER DRUGS. In response to the original question and response a whole slew of people made all sorts of overly emotional claims that companies "advertise drugs all over the world" -- but now we've found out that they were either too stupid to read the original question and answer correctly, or were lying. But, the big question for me is: why such a HUGE and emotional response to the question? After all, it's only drug ads. Oh yea, drug companies pay people to post on the Internet, I forgot for a second. Sorry.
Posted by: Andrew Griffith | November 16, 2007 at 11:19 AM
And, Dan Smith is probably the stupidest of all the people I alluded to above, because he read all the posts ... and then decided that they DISPROVED the original post, when they actually SUPPORTED the original post. So, I know one thing about him for sure ... he's American, because only an American could be that dumb.
Posted by: Andrew Griffith | November 16, 2007 at 11:24 AM
omfg hATE VIVA vagria stuff
Posted by: co | February 23, 2008 at 03:41 PM