Abbott caught altering entries to Wikipedia
Several drug companies have now been caught deleting important information from Wikipedia, in order to downplay the risk of their drugs.
The first drug company caught messing with the Wikipedia was AstraZeneca. References to claims that Seroquel allegedly made teenagers “more likely to think about harming or killing themselves” were deleted by a user of a computer registered to the drug company, according to Times.
According to Patients not Patents, now it is Abbott Laboratories who've been caught doing the same thing. The group alleges that "employees of Abbott Laboratories have been altering entries to Wikipedia, the popular online encyclopedia, to eliminate information questioning the safety of its top-selling drugs."
The tool used to catch these corporate erasers is the WikiScanner, which was developed by Virgil Griffith, a researcher at the California Institute of Technology, and it reveals changes to the online encyclopaedia by linking edits back to the computers from which they were done, using each computer’s unique IP address. The scanner has wreaked havoc in news media, politics and among corporations caught redhanded "improving" articles.
Patients not Patents found that in July of 2007, a computer at Abbott Laboratories’ Chicago office was used to delete a reference to a Mayo Clinic study that revealed that patients taking the arthritis drug Humira faced triple the risk of developing certain kinds of cancers and twice the risk of developing serious infections. The study was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2006.
The same computer was used to remove articles describing public interest groups’ attempt to have Abbott’s weight-loss drug Meridia banned after the drug was found to increase the risk of heart attack and stroke in some patients.
The site’s editors restored the deleted information, but Patients not Patents claim that Abbott’s activities illustrate drug companies’ eagerness to suppress safety concerns.
Jeffrey Light, Executive Director of the Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group said, “The argument that drug companies can be trusted to provide adequate safety information on their own products has been used by the pharmaceutical industry to fight against government regulation of consumer advertising. Clearly such trust is misplaced. As Abbott’s actions have demonstrated, drug companies will attempt to hide unfavorable safety information when they think nobody is watching.”
- Peter Rost, M.D. is a former VP of Pfizer and the author of Killer Drug and The Whistleblower.
What readers loved to read on BrandweekNRX today:
1. Abbott caught altering entries to Wikipedia
I don't see what the big deal is about them modifying a freely editable article.
Posted by: Fred | August 30, 2007 at 01:50 PM
I don't see what the big deal is about them deleting facts--that help others but hurt them--using in a freely editable article.
There, fixed.
Posted by: Scott D. Strader | August 30, 2007 at 02:15 PM
I guess it won't be long before they make sure to edit the wikipedia articles from their home pc's rather than from their work computers.
Posted by: Jim Campbell | August 30, 2007 at 02:23 PM
lol,i like it.
Posted by: wow gold | August 30, 2007 at 10:59 PM
lol,i think i gained a lot from this site.
Posted by: wow power leveling | August 30, 2007 at 11:01 PM
Wikipedia needs a reputation system. Not only for contributors but also for the content itself.
Someone tries to edit the page for "George W. Bush" and is disallowed since the text's reputability has scored higher - through the reputation of those who have contributed it - than the reputability of the person trying to edit. Not whuffie, reputation + credibility.
Posted by: RamsesAbasiri | August 31, 2007 at 02:06 AM
Sure it's awful but it's Wikipedia, lawyers, and the drug companies, do you really expect any better?
We all know that you can't trust the drug companies or lawyers because they are businesses and in it for the money. The problem is that a lot of people think you can trust Wikipedia for some reason.
It all makes me laugh and cry at the same time.
Posted by: Dig T | September 14, 2007 at 08:02 PM
Cephalexin is used to treat many different types of bacterial infections such as bronchitis, tonsillitis, ear infections, skin infections, and urinary tract infections. http://www.nordmed.com/generic-cephalexin-medication.php
Generic Levaquin (Levofloxacin) is an antibiotic in a class of drugs called fluoroquinolones. It fights bacteria in the body.Levofloxacin is used to treat various types of bacterial infections. http://www.nordmed.com/generic-levaquin-medication.php
Generic Valtrex (Valacyclovir) is used in the treatment and suppression of genital herpes, shingles, and cold sores. Valacyclovir is not a cure for herpes virus infections. http://www.nordmed.com/generic-valtrex-medication.php
Posted by: Drug store without prescription | May 06, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Actually we are the search people who are all wanted to recovery. There past life may be sinked in the achol due to them addiction. But we defintely change them life style here after..
-----------------------------
fedrick
Suffering from an addiction. This website has a lot of great resources and treatment centers.
http://www.treatmentcenters.org
Posted by: fedrick | June 05, 2008 at 09:12 AM
This is a fantastic idea and I am sure it will help quite a few people out there! http://www.mymovie-downloads.com
Posted by: asdasd | July 31, 2008 at 09:11 AM
Buying medicines is easier and convenient now! Thanks to Internet pharmacies. I have been shopping for my medicines at eshoprx.com and I must share this with you all that this is the cheapest pharmacy. Their quality is at par and delvery fast.
Posted by: GARY HULETT | January 23, 2009 at 05:43 AM